Is it recommended to use only those Scrum components which suit most for a particular project?

In Scrum, it is not advisable to selectively apply only those components that seem to fit a particular project. The Scrum framework consists of a set of roles, events, and artifacts that are designed to work together to foster a productive and adaptive environment for delivering value. When elements of Scrum are altered or omitted based on perceived suitability, it undermines the framework's integrity and can lead to reduced effectiveness in achieving collaboration, transparency, and inspection.

Using the full Scrum framework ensures that teams are adhering to best practices that have been proven to facilitate control and improvement over the development process. By employing all the Scrum components as intended, teams can better leverage the collective benefits, such as regular feedback loops, defined roles for accountability, and structured approaches to planning and review.

Additionally, the essence of Scrum lies in its philosophical foundation, which emphasizes empirical process control, adaptability, and holistic development. Not using the complete framework can steer teams away from these principles, making it harder to achieve successful outcomes. Thus, adhering strictly to the components of Scrum is essential for maintaining the framework's intended purpose and effectiveness.